Skip to main content

Did Brett Kavanaugh RAPE and SEXUALLY ASSAULT Multiple Females?

The law is an affront to God himself. Did Brett Kavanaugh do something to females while drunk many years ago? Chances are that he did not. However, there is no way to know for sure. Witnesses can be created or destroyed convinced or deceived honest or dishonest fake or real genuine or counterfeit telling the truth or lying, and there is no way to know. They could be making up stories to defame Brett or they could be telling what really happened, or they could be imagining what happened and think they're telling the truth when really they're just victims of implanted memories placed there by evil psychiatrists and therapists engaged in evil practices such as hypnotherapy or rapid eye movement therapy.

What doesn't matter is whether or not Brett Kavanaugh was a nasty guy as a young man. The legal system itself has transcended morality with the passing of civil rights, women being allowed to vote, and eventually abortion and gay "rights" (not a real thing) being codified into America's sick zombified morally rotten limping corpse horror show core.

The murder of unborn children is legal. The destruction of free association is mandatory. Women are allowed to parade around and molest children in the public school system and become priests in religions where women are explicitly told not to become priests and accept men as their natural superiors. All of these things and more should be sending a clear message: The Law has become satanic and disorderly and thus the only moral action to take is not to participate in and thus justify and strengthen The Law, but to rather refuse to engage in any manner that validates The Law and it follows society as a whole. We live in a society, but we should not live for society.

Brett Kavanaugh's Verdict? GUILTY as an enabler of satanism itself. Hopefully all members of the justice system are accused by the women they empower and have their reputations ruined regardless of whether or not they are true. The only people who are innocent in today's society are the drug addicts and felons and welfare abusers whose lives degrade and strain this system and will do so until collapse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Uncovered Trump Quote Will Change Your View On Him Forever

"I have the biggest brain, believe me folks. I'm not a moron, because my brain is yuge. You will never see Hillary Clinton with a brain this big, because her brain is small like a dog, or a black person. My yuge brain is the biggest, it's the greatest folks, it really is, I can make anybody in my moronic voter base agree with whatever my big boy brain says, because I am a white man with the best genes - the very best! I have never seen a brain like my own, and believe me I have looked at many, so so so many, brains. I'm a serial killer nutjob clown owned by Russia and I rape women then kill them and dissect their tiny brains. Guess what folks, their brains are so puny, like walnuts banging around in their skulls... bing bang boom boom bing bong bing ping pong ding a long dingaroo dee doo doop.. It's no good folks, it's like those trade deals in China, unfair bigly, almost as big as my brain! Did I mention that I'm so rich? Sure my dad - a KKK lead

Are Zoos Racist? And Other Questions

Sometimes, I wonder. Do monkeys call each other the n-word? Not literally of course, I doubt many if any at all even know how to speak in the English language. They haven't even been shown to understand how to sign language in proper English of their own volition as far as I know. The question is if monkeys have a "sign" or sound in their monkey language that is the equivalent of the n-word (hard r, said with prejudice and hate) that white people say to blacks. If monkeys do indeed, as I suspect, have their own version of the n-word, what does that mean in reference to our society? On one hand the argument can be made that this justifies the imprisonment and lack of human rights of monkeys, as they are hateful and bigoted and thus don't deserve human rights. On another hand monkeys saying the n-word can be shown analogous to men being interested in younger, fitter, "prettier", women with less partners than fatter, older, more sexually experienced women. Wh

Radical Exclusionary Action

At first glance this tweet seems to say that its author wishes he didn't want to be involved with these people in any manner, that their thoughts are a net negative on his life. However, when you look at the attached image and the highlighted word "Kavanaugh" in all the selected tweets, it becomes clear that these tweets have been searched out rather than forced to be viewed. What exactly does that mean? That there is obviously some desire - even if it is solely for this tweet - for those peoples' ideas to be observed. Kantbot's point about it being tiring to see what random people think about a political topic is definitely accurate, which is partially why I have taken to blocking most pundits and turning off retweets/muting anybody who interacts with anybody I find annoying or trite. This sort of behavior can be extended to real life, where you simply remove yourself from any topic of discussion you have an expertise in and instead focus on subjects you have